↓ Skip to main content

Epiphylly in Angiosperms

Overview of attention for article published in The Botanical Review, April 1978
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Epiphylly in Angiosperms
Published in
The Botanical Review, April 1978
DOI 10.1007/bf02919079
Authors

Timothy A. Dickinson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 11%
Colombia 1 5%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 15 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 84%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#75
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,378
of 5,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them