↓ Skip to main content

On the optimal filtering of diffusion processes

Overview of attention for article published in Probability Theory and Related Fields, January 1969
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
550 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
On the optimal filtering of diffusion processes
Published in
Probability Theory and Related Fields, January 1969
DOI 10.1007/bf00536382
Authors

Moshe Zakai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 8%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 54 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 30%
Researcher 14 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Professor 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 33%
Mathematics 14 23%
Computer Science 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Probability Theory and Related Fields
#51
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,482
of 13,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Probability Theory and Related Fields
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.