↓ Skip to main content

Body fat in identical twins reared apart: Roles for genes and environment

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, January 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Body fat in identical twins reared apart: Roles for genes and environment
Published in
Behavior Genetics, January 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf01067662
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Arlen Price, Irving I. Gottesman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Psychology 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2010.
All research outputs
#7,547,578
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#367
of 915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,005
of 59,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them