↓ Skip to main content

Recessive mutations in VPS13D cause childhood onset movement disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Neurology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recessive mutations in VPS13D cause childhood onset movement disorders
Published in
Annals of Neurology, April 2018
DOI 10.1002/ana.25204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Gauthier, Inge A. Meijer, Davor Lessel, Niccolò E. Mencacci, Dimitri Krainc, Maja Hempel, Konstantinos Tsiakas, Holger Prokisch, Elsa Rossignol, Margaret H. Helm, Lance H. Rodan, Jason Karamchandani, Miryam Carecchio, Steven J. Lubbe, Aida Telegrafi, Lindsay B. Henderson, Kerry Lorenzo, Stephanie E. Wallace, Ian A. Glass, Fadi F. Hamdan, Jacques L. Michaud, Guy A. Rouleau, Philippe M. Campeau

Abstract

VPS13 protein family members VPS13A through VPS13C have been associated with various recessive movement disorders. We describe the first disease association of rare recessive VPS13D variants including frameshift, missense, and partial duplication mutations with a novel complex, hyperkinetic neurological disorder. The clinical features include developmental delay, a childhood onset movement disorder (chorea, dystonia, or tremor), and progressive spastic ataxia or paraparesis. Characteristic brain magnetic resonance imaging shows basal ganglia or diffuse white matter T2 hyperintensities as seen in Leigh syndrome and choreoacanthocytosis. Muscle biopsy in 1 case showed mitochondrial aggregates and lipidosis, suggesting mitochondrial dysfunction. These findings underline the importance of the VPS13 complex in neurological diseases and a possible role in mitochondrial function. Ann Neurol 2018.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 31 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 37 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,378,457
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#4,541
of 5,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,841
of 329,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#48
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.