↓ Skip to main content

Multifunctional Receptor-Directed Drugs for Disorders of the Central Nervous System

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Multifunctional Receptor-Directed Drugs for Disorders of the Central Nervous System
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, January 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.10.031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerry J Buccafusco

Abstract

The marked decline in FDA-approved new drug candidates in recent years suggests the possibility that the "low-hanging fruit" has been almost entirely harvested. This might be particularly applicable to drugs acting on the central nervous system. Fortunately, there are several examples extant for the utility of multifunctional drugs, compounds, or drug mixtures that act on multiple additive or synergistic targets. However, to exploit this approach may require the willingness to consider the possibility that drug targets might be addressed by molecules of rather low specificity and moderate potency. The expectation is that single target molecules with high specificity might not have access to complex interacting neural pathways, and that moderate potency could engender fewer off-target side effects. Though novel compounds might be developed by combining the active functional groups of two or more drug molecules, the approach still lends itself to high throughput screening of large chemical libraries. Multifunctional compounds might be designed with the ability to: 1) offer both palliative and disease modifying actions, 2) act on targets that produce additive or synergistic therapeutic responses, 3) simultaneously evoke a therapeutic response at the desired target and prevent an undesired response mediated by an alternate target, 4) allow one component to promote the drugable characteristics (e.g., brain penetration) of the therapeutic component, and 5) prolong the duration of effectiveness of one compound by contributing the pharmacodynamic actions of another. The author takes the liberty to include examples of the situations just mentioned from studies in his laboratory in the following discussion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Psychology 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Chemistry 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#771
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,780
of 183,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.