↓ Skip to main content

Managing Asthma in Pregnancy (MAP) trial: FENO levels and childhood asthma

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
28 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Managing Asthma in Pregnancy (MAP) trial: FENO levels and childhood asthma
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Morten, Adam Collison, Vanessa E Murphy, Daniel Barker, Christopher Oldmeadow, John Attia, Joseph Meredith, Heather Powell, Paul D Robinson, Peter D Sly, Peter G Gibson, Joerg Mattes

Abstract

The single-centre double-blind, randomised controlled Managing Asthma in Pregnancy (MAP) trial in Newcastle, Australia, compared a treatment algorithm using the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in combination with asthma symptoms (FeNO group) against a treatment algorithm using clinical symptoms only (clinical group) in pregnant asthmatic women (ANZ Clinical Trials Registry, number 12607000561482). The primary outcome was a 50% reduction in asthma exacerbations during pregnancy in the FeNO group. However, the effect of FeNO-guided management on the development of asthma in the offspring is unknown. We sought to investigate the effect of FeNO-guided asthma management during pregnancy on asthma incidence in childhood. 179 mothers consented to participate in the Growing Into Asthma (GIA) double-blind follow-up study with the primary aim to determine the effect of FeNO-guided asthma management on childhood asthma incidence. 140 children (78%) were followed up at 4 to 6 years of age. FeNO-guided as compared to symptoms only based approach significantly reduced doctor diagnosed asthma (25·9% versus 43·2%; odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22 to 0.96, p=0.04). Furthermore frequent wheeze (OR 0.27; CI 0.09 to 0.87, p=0.03), use of short-acting beta agonists (OR 0.49; CI 0.25 to 0.97; p=0.04), and emergency department visits for asthma (OR 0.17, CI 0.04 to 0.76; p=0.02) in the past 12 months were less common in children born to mothers from the FeNO group. Doctor diagnosed asthma was associated with common risk alleles for early-onset asthma at gene locus 17q21 (p=0·01 for rs8069176; p=0·03 for rs8076131), and higher airways resistance (p=0·02) and FeNO levels (p=0·03). A causal mediation analysis suggested natural indirect effects of FeNO-guided asthma management on childhood asthma through "any use" and "time to first change in dose" of inhaled corticosteroids during the MAP trial (OR 0.83; CI 0.59 to 0.99 and OR 0.90, CI 0.70 to 1.03, respectively). FeNO-guided asthma management during pregnancy prevented doctor diagnosed asthma in the offspring at preschool age, in part mediated through changes in use and dosing of inhaled corticosteroids during the MAP trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Other 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Unspecified 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 37 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2023.
All research outputs
#867,958
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#703
of 11,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,703
of 348,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#39
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.