↓ Skip to main content

The usefulness of99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamineoxime white blood cell scintigraphy in a patient with eosinophilic gastroenteritis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Nuclear Medicine, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
The usefulness of99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamineoxime white blood cell scintigraphy in a patient with eosinophilic gastroenteritis
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/bf03006675
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erika Imai, Tatsuro Kaminaga, Kazuo Kawasugi, Tokuzo Yokokawa, Shigeru Furui

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Materials Science 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#112
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,521
of 165,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them