You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, April 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00416-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven M. Miller, Guang B. Liu, Trung T. Ngo, Greg Hooper, Stephan Riek, Richard G. Carson, John D. Pettigrew |
| Abstract |
Binocular rivalry refers to the alternating perceptual states that occur when the images seen by the two eyes are too different to be fused into a single percept. Logothetis and colleagues have challenged suggestions that this phenomenon occurs early in the visual pathway. They have shown that, in alert monkeys, neurons in the primary visual cortex continue to respond to their preferred stimulus despite the monkey reporting its absence. Moreover, they found that neural activity higher in the visual pathway is highly correlated with the monkey's reported percept. These and other findings suggest that the neural substrate of binocular rivalry must involve high levels, perhaps the same levels involved in reversible figure alternations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 169 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 9% |
| Professor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 60 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#7,371
of 14,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,029
of 40,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.