| Title |
Carvedilol for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity The CECCY Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mônica Samuel Avila, Silvia Moreira Ayub-Ferreira, Mauro Rogerio de Barros Wanderley, Fatima das Dores Cruz, Sara Michelly Gonçalves Brandão, Vagner Oliveira Carvalho Rigaud, Marília Harumi Higuchi-Dos-Santos, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar, Roberto Kalil Filho, Paulo Marcelo Hoff, Marina Sahade, Marcela S M Ferrari, Romulo Leopoldo de Paula Costa, Max Senna Mano, Cecilia Beatriz Bittencourt Viana Cruz, Maria Cristina Abduch, Marco Stephan Lofrano Alves, Guilherme Veiga Guimaraes, Victor Sarli Issa, Marcio Sommer Bittencourt, Edimar Alcides Bocchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 191 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 13% |
| Spain | 12 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 10 | 5% |
| Mexico | 9 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Brazil | 7 | 4% |
| Argentina | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Chile | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 135 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 12% |
| Scientists | 22 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 322 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 66 | 20% |
| Unknown | 115 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 137 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Unknown | 122 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 177. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#231,802
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#529
of 17,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,369
of 352,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#13
of 415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.