↓ Skip to main content

Printing cell-laden gelatin constructs by free-form fabrication and enzymatic protein crosslinking

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Printing cell-laden gelatin constructs by free-form fabrication and enzymatic protein crosslinking
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10544-014-9915-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott A. Irvine, Animesh Agrawal, Bae Hoon Lee, Hui Yee Chua, Kok Yao Low, Boon Chong Lau, Marcelle Machluf, Subbu Venkatraman

Abstract

Considerable interest has arisen in precision fabrication of cell bearing scaffolds and structures by free form fabrication. Gelatin is an ideal material for creating cell entrapping constructs, yet its application in free form fabrication remains challenging. We demonstrate the use of gelatin, crosslinked with microbial transglutaminase (mTgase), as a material to print cell bearing hydrogels for both 2-dimensional (2-D) precision patterns and 3-dimensional (3-D) constructs. The precision patterning was attained with 3 % gelatin and 2 % high molecular weight poly (ethylene oxide) (PEO) whereas 3-D constructs were obtained using a 5 % gelatin solution. These hydrogels, referred to as "bioinks" supported entrapped cell growth, allowing cell spreading and proliferation for both HEK293 cells and Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs). These bioinks were shown to be dispensable by robotic precision, forming patterns and constructs that were insoluble and of suitable stiffness to endure post gelation handling. The two bioinks were further characterized for fabrication parameters and mechanical properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 181 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 23%
Student > Master 33 18%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 51 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 9%
Materials Science 14 8%
Chemistry 10 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 45 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,102,803
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#80
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,314
of 352,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.