↓ Skip to main content

Staphylococcal-scalded skin syndrome: evaluation, diagnosis, and management

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Pediatrics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Staphylococcal-scalded skin syndrome: evaluation, diagnosis, and management
Published in
World Journal of Pediatrics, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12519-018-0150-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander K. C. Leung, Benjamin Barankin, Kin Fon Leong

Abstract

Staphylococcal-scalded skin syndrome (SSSS), also known as Ritter disease, is a potentially life-threatening disorder and a pediatric emergency. Early diagnosis and treatment is imperative to reduce the morbidity and mortality of this condition. The purpose of this article is to familiarize physicians with the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of SSSS. A PubMed search was completed in Clinical Queries using the key terms "Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome" and "Ritter disease". SSSS is caused by toxigenic strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Hydrolysis of the amino-terminal extracellular domain of desmoglein 1 by staphylococcal exfoliative toxins results in disruption of keratinocytes adhesion and cleavage within the stratum granulosum which leads to bulla formation. The diagnosis is mainly clinical, based on the findings of tender erythroderma, bullae, and desquamation with a scalded appearance especially in friction zones, periorificial scabs/crusting, positive Nikolsky sign, and absence of mucosal involvement. Prompt empiric treatment with intravenous anti-staphylococcal antibiotic such as nafcillin, oxacillin, or flucloxacillin is essential until cultures are available to guide therapy. Clarithromycin or cefuroxime may be used should the patient have penicillin allergy. If the patient is not improving, critically ill, or in communities where the prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus is high, vancomycin should be used. A high index of suspicion is essential for an accurate diagnosis to be made and treatment promptly initiated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 18%
Other 16 9%
Student > Master 15 8%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 76 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 81 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,993,143
of 24,151,461 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Pediatrics
#72
of 625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,187
of 335,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Pediatrics
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,151,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 625 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.