↓ Skip to main content

Plant virtues are in the eyes of the beholders: A comparison of known palm uses among indigenous and folk communities of Southwestern Amazonia

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Plant virtues are in the eyes of the beholders: A comparison of known palm uses among indigenous and folk communities of Southwestern Amazonia
Published in
Economic Botany, September 2003
DOI 10.1663/0013-0001(2003)057[0324:pvaite]2.0.co;2
Authors

Marina Thereza Campos, Christiane Ehringhaus

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 7%
Burkina Faso 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Costa Rica 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 24%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Professor 8 8%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 52%
Environmental Science 16 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#306
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,837
of 53,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.