↓ Skip to main content

Chronic pain in medullary sponge kidney: a rare and never described clinical presentation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nephrology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Chronic pain in medullary sponge kidney: a rare and never described clinical presentation
Published in
Journal of Nephrology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40620-018-0480-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Gambaro, D. S. Goldfarb, R. Baccaro, J. Hirsch, N. Topilow, S. D’Alonzo, G. Gambassi, P. M. Ferraro

Abstract

Medullary sponge kidney (MSK) is a cause of nephrocalcinosis, associated with hematuria, renal colic, pyelonephritis. There are rare and atypical MSK cases characterized by chronic severe pain (CP), whose features are unknown, in particular the relationship with the stone disease activity. This study analyzes a cohort of MSK-CP patients belonging to three North-America self-support Facebook groups. Patients had to self-administer an on-line questionnaire (on intensity, progression and MSK-associated conditions, stone-related disease, pain features, drug use), the Brief Pain Inventory, the Fatigue Severity Score, and Wisconsin Quality of Life (WQL) in stone formers questionnaires. Ninety-two patients with a diagnosis of MSK joined our survey. Stone rate was very high (3.1 stones per patient-year, < 15% of patients had ≤ 1 stone per year). Most patients had repeated hospitalizations for stones symptoms (p < 0.001) or pain (p < 0.005). 71% of participants referred a daily pain that interfered strongly with everyday life and quality of life (WQL mean value 29.4). 69% used pain medications daily (70% opioids). In most cases, pain was associated with stone passage, while 15% referred a sine materia pain. We showed how MSK-CP symptoms affect very negatively on the quality of life of these patients. They also have a definite risk of progressing to end-stage kidney disease. Generally, CP seems to be associated with an exceptionally high lithogenic activity, suggesting that a better and earlier metabolic treatment for stone prevention should be the first approach in these patients before mini-invasive treatments to prevent pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,726,457
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nephrology
#289
of 1,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,385
of 334,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nephrology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.