↓ Skip to main content

胃粘膜にリン酸ランタン沈着を認めた慢性腎不全患者の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
胃粘膜にリン酸ランタン沈着を認めた慢性腎不全患者の1例
Published in
Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology, July 2016
DOI 10.11405/nisshoshi.113.1216
Pubmed ID
Authors

岩室 雅也, 神崎 洋光, 田中 健大, 川野 誠司, 河原 祥朗, 岡田 裕之

Abstract

A 77-year-old Japanese man underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection twice over a 5-year period for the treatment of two separate early gastric cancers. He had been taking lanthanum carbonate, an orally administered phosphate binder, for 3 years. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed reddish mucosa in the greater curvature and anterior wall of the gastric angle, while granular, white deposits were also observed in some areas of this reddish mucosa. Additionally, biopsy specimens from the gastric mucosa revealed the deposition of fine, amorphous, eosinophilic material, which appeared bright on scanning electron microscopy. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy revealed the presence of lanthanum and phosphate in these bright areas, and elemental mapping confirmed that their distribution was identical to that seen in the bright areas. Based on these findings, the diagnosis of lanthanum phosphate deposition in the gastric mucosa was determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,520,469
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology
#99
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,000
of 367,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them