| Title |
Knowledge, consumption, and endogenous growth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, January 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/pl00003858 |
| Authors |
Richard N. Langlois |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 32% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Professor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 30% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 19 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#32
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,777
of 114,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them