Title |
Biopsy techniques and yields in diagnosing primary intraocular lymphoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Ophthalmology, April 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10792-007-9065-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John A. Gonzales, Chi-Chao Chan |
Abstract |
A review of current biopsy techniques that are used in obtaining specimens from which to make a diagnosis of primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) is presented. Methods for obtaining and subsequently testing vitrectomy specimens are discussed. In addition, the yields of external and internal approaches for obtaining chorioretinal tissue, and diagnostic vitrectomies, are reviewed. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 26% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 54% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,937,113
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#24
of 1,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,353
of 74,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,032 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.