↓ Skip to main content

Frequent ploidy changes in growing yeast cultures

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genetics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 1,225)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Frequent ploidy changes in growing yeast cultures
Published in
Current Genetics, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00294-018-0823-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yaniv Harari, Yoav Ram, Martin Kupiec

Abstract

Ploidy is considered a very stable cellular characteristic. Although rare, changes in ploidy play important roles in the acquisition of long-term adaptations. Since these duplications allow the subsequent loss of individual chromosomes and accumulation of mutations, changes in ploidy can also cause genomic instability, and have been found to promote cancer. Despite the importance of the subject, measuring the rate of whole-genome duplications has proven extremely challenging. We have recently measured the rate of diploidization in yeast using long-term, in-lab experiments. We found that spontaneous diploidization occurs frequently, by two different mechanisms: endoreduplication and mating type switching. Despite its common occurrence, spontaneous diploidization is usually selected against, although it can be advantageous under some stressful conditions. Our results have implications for the understanding of evolutionary processes, as well as for the use of yeast cells in biotechnological applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,687,071
of 24,962,233 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#46
of 1,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,663
of 338,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,962,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.