| Title |
Conflicts between touristic recreational activities and breeding shearwaters: short-term effect of artificial light and sound on chick weight
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-018-1178-x |
| Authors |
Marco Cianchetti-Benedetti, Paolo Becciu, Bruno Massa, Giacomo Dell’Omo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
| Portugal | 3 | 8% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 66% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 31% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,279,291
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#59
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,372
of 338,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.