↓ Skip to main content

Comparisons between the diets of distant taxa (teleost and cormorant) in an Australian estuary

Overview of attention for article published in Estuaries and Coasts, September 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Comparisons between the diets of distant taxa (teleost and cormorant) in an Australian estuary
Published in
Estuaries and Coasts, September 1992
DOI 10.2307/1352780
Authors

Paul Humphries, Glenn A. Hyndes, Ian C. Potter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 7%
South Africa 1 3%
Romania 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 33%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 67%
Environmental Science 4 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#498
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,136
of 17,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.