You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Ann M. Farrell, Leah C. Osterhaus Trzasko, Tara J. Brigham |
| Abstract |
To determine whether librarian and information specialist authorship was associated with better reported systematic review (SR) search quality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 245 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 59 | 24% |
| United States | 33 | 13% |
| Spain | 18 | 7% |
| Canada | 16 | 7% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Norway | 3 | 1% |
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 75 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 126 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 53 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 39 | 16% |
| Scientists | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 424 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 104 | 23% |
| Researcher | 22 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 50 | 11% |
| Unknown | 217 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 227 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#201,667
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#31
of 4,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,304
of 362,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#2
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.