↓ Skip to main content

An International Approach to Enhancing a National Guideline on Driving and Dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
An International Approach to Enhancing a National Guideline on Driving and Dementia
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11920-018-0879-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark J. Rapoport, Justin N. Chee, David B. Carr, Frank Molnar, Gary Naglie, Jamie Dow, Richard Marottoli, Sara Mitchell, Mark Tant, Nathan Herrmann, Krista L. Lanctôt, John-Paul Taylor, Paul C. Donaghy, Sherrilene Classen, Desmond O’Neill

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to update a national guideline on assessing drivers with dementia, addressing limitations of previous versions which included a lack of developmental rigor and stakeholder involvement. An international multidisciplinary team reviewed 104 different recommendations from 12 previous guidelines on assessing drivers with dementia in light of a recent review of the literature. Revised guideline recommendations were drafted by consensus. A preliminary draft was sent to specialist physician and occupational therapy groups for feedback, using an a priori definition of 90% agreement as consensus. The research team drafted 23 guideline recommendations, and responses were received from 145 stakeholders. No recommendation was endorsed by less than 80% of respondents, and 14 (61%) of the recommendations were endorsed by more than 90%.The recommendations are presented in the manuscript. The revised guideline incorporates the perspectives of consensus of an expert group as well as front-line clinicians who regularly assess drivers with dementia. The majority of the recommendations were based on evidence at the level of expert opinion, revealing gaps in the evidence and future directions for research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 22 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 26 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,650,512
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#194
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,020
of 337,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.