↓ Skip to main content

PLUNC in human nasal lavage fluid: multiple isoforms that bind to lipopolysaccharide

Overview of attention for article published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA), June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PLUNC in human nasal lavage fluid: multiple isoforms that bind to lipopolysaccharide
Published in
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA), June 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.bbapap.2004.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bijar Ghafouri, Erik Kihlström, Christer Tagesson, Mats Lindahl

Abstract

Here, we demonstrate the presence of multiple isoforms of palate lung nasal epithelial clone (PLUNC) in human nasal lavage fluid (NLF). Eight isoforms were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), and peptide mapping of the proteins was performed using MALDI-TOF MS (matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry) of tryptic and asparginase cleavages. The identification was verified by amino acid sequencing after analysis of collision-induced dissociation (CID) fragmentation spectra with nanoelectrospray MS/MS. One isoform showed an electrophoretic mobility shift after N-glycosidase treatment, indicating that at least one of the PLUNC isoforms is glycosylated. We also demonstrate that PLUNC in NLF binds to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in vitro; indeed, out of all proteins present in NLF only the PLUNC isoforms were found to adsorb to an LPS-coated surface. These results show that PLUNC is expressed as multiple LPS-binding isoforms in human NLF. The possibility that PLUNC may play a role in the innate immune response of the upper airways is inferred.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Portugal 1 6%
Poland 1 6%
Unknown 15 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Researcher 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)
#2,452
of 19,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,792
of 62,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)
#14
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.