| Title |
Modern Numerical Ephemerides of Planets and the Importance of Ranging Observations for Their Creation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, July 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1012289530641 |
| Authors |
E.V. Pitjeva |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 13% |
| Russia | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 53% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 20% |
| Engineering | 3 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
#200
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,991
of 40,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.