Title |
The rodent fauna of Tanzania: a cytotaxonomic report from the Maasai Steppe (1999)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, March 2001
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02904520 |
Authors |
Ernesto Capanna, Riccardo Castiglia, Paolo Colangelo, Marco Corti, Alessandra Scanzani, Carlo Fadda, Walter Verheyen, Robert Machang’u, Rodes Makundi, Protas Tesha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Israel | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 50% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 20% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali
#66
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,267
of 42,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.