↓ Skip to main content

Roll vortices in the planetary boundary layer: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Boundary-Layer Meteorology, August 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
419 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Roll vortices in the planetary boundary layer: A review
Published in
Boundary-Layer Meteorology, August 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00705527
Authors

D. Etling, R. A. Brown

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 34%
Researcher 25 22%
Professor 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 57 49%
Physics and Astronomy 14 12%
Engineering 10 9%
Environmental Science 9 8%
Energy 4 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Boundary-Layer Meteorology
#70
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,534
of 19,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boundary-Layer Meteorology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them