↓ Skip to main content

Application of an Optimized Tape Stripping Method for the Bioequivalence Assessment of Topical Acyclovir Creams

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS PharmSciTech, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Application of an Optimized Tape Stripping Method for the Bioequivalence Assessment of Topical Acyclovir Creams
Published in
AAPS PharmSciTech, February 2018
DOI 10.1208/s12249-018-0971-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sumalatha Nallagundla, Srinivas Patnala, Isadore Kanfer

Abstract

This study indicates the application of tape stripping (TS) for bioequivalence (BE) assessment of a topical cream product containing 5% acyclovir. A TS method, previously used successfully to assess BE of topical clobetasol propionate and clotrimazole formulations, was used to assess BE of an acyclovir cream (5%) formulation as well as a diluted acyclovir formulation (1.5%) applied to the skin of healthy humans. An appropriate application time was established by conducting a dose duration study using the innovator product, Zovirax® cream. Transepidermal water loss was measured and used to normalize thicknesses between subjects. The area under the curve (AUC) from a plot of amount of acyclovir/strip vs cumulative fraction of stratum corneum (SC) removed was calculated for each application site. BE was assessed using Fieller's theorem in accordance with FDA's guidance for assessment of BE of topical corticosteroids. Adco-acyclovir cream (5%) was found to be BE to Zovirax® cream, where the mean test/reference (T/R) ratio of the AUC's was 0.96 and the bioequivalence interval using a 90% confidence interval was 0.91-1.01 with a statistical power > 95%, whereas the diluted test product fell outside the BE acceptance criteria with T/R ratio of AUC of 0.23 and a 90% CI of 0.20-0.26. This study indicates that the data resulting from the application of this TS procedure has reinforced the potential for its use to assess BE of topical drug products intended for local action, thereby obviating the necessity to undertake clinical trials in patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 25%
Researcher 6 25%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,087,986
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#148
of 1,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,664
of 330,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.