You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four‐dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jmri.21082 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas A. Hope, Michael Markl, Lars Wigström, Marcus T. Alley, D. Craig Miller, Robert J. Herfkens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 150 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 34 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 61 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 33% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,547,578
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#939
of 3,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,505
of 157,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#44
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,606 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.