| Title |
The Epigenetic Impact of Cruciferous Vegetables on Cancer Prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Pharmacology Reports, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40495-014-0003-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kendra J. Royston, Trygve O. Tollefsbol |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 15% |
| Saudi Arabia | 8 | 6% |
| Mexico | 8 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 62 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 106 | 84% |
| Scientists | 9 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#255,305
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Current Pharmacology Reports
#3
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,927
of 361,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pharmacology Reports
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.