↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of seed-bank data confirms suitability of international seed-storage standards for the Australian flora

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Journal of Botany, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of seed-bank data confirms suitability of international seed-storage standards for the Australian flora
Published in
Australian Journal of Botany, January 2007
DOI 10.1071/bt06038
Authors

Andrew D. Crawford, Kathryn J. Steadman, Julie A. Plummer, Anne Cochrane, Robin J. Probert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Caledonia 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 42%
Environmental Science 6 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2009.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Botany
#98
of 636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,863
of 173,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Botany
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them