↓ Skip to main content

The populations of Galba truncatula, known for their natural infections with Haplometra cylindracea (Digenea, Plagiorchioidea), are better intermediate hosts for metacercarial production of Fasciola…

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
The populations of Galba truncatula, known for their natural infections with Haplometra cylindracea (Digenea, Plagiorchioidea), are better intermediate hosts for metacercarial production of Fasciola hepatica
Published in
Parasitology Research, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00436-006-0387-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Vignoles, D. Rondelaud, G. Dreyfuss

Abstract

Laboratory investigations on Galba truncatula were carried out to determine if snails coming from four populations known to be natural intermediate hosts of Haplometra cylindracea, a digenean species of frogs, would not be better hosts for experimental infections with Fasciola hepatica than those originating from two communities in which H. cylindracea was never found in the past years. Uninfected G. truncatula were used to constitute six groups of snails (one per population) before being subjected to individual monomiracidial exposures with F. hepatica. Insignificant differences between mean values were noted for snail survival at day 30 post-exposure, prevalence of snail infection with F. hepatica, and prepatent period. In contrast, the duration of cercarial shedding and the number of F. hepatica cercariae in the four groups known for natural infections with H. cylindracea were significantly greater. The use of these last lymnaeid populations for experimental infections with F. hepatica allows to have high numbers of cercariae because of long patent periods and, as a consequence, strongly reduces the cost price of these larvae for scientific purposes and/or commercial production.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 2 10%
Mexico 1 5%
Unknown 17 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Professor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 70%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#621
of 3,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,518
of 155,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.