↓ Skip to main content

Melanin-Concentrating Hormone MCH1 Receptor Antagonists

Overview of attention for article published in CNS Drugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Melanin-Concentrating Hormone MCH1 Receptor Antagonists
Published in
CNS Drugs, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00023210-200620100-00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshiharu Shimazaki, Takao Yoshimizu, Shigeyuki Chaki

Abstract

Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is a cyclic 19-amino-acid neuropeptide that has been considered to play a key role in the regulation of feeding and energy homeostasis. To date, two receptor subtypes for MCH (designated MCH(1) and MCH(2)) have been identified; the MCH(1) receptor has been proposed to mediate the physiological functions of MCH in rodents. In addition to the crucial roles of MCH in feeding behaviour, anatomical and neurochemical studies suggest that the MCH/MCH(1) system is involved in the regulation of emotion and stress responses. This assumption has been supported by a recent series of neurochemical and behavioural studies. Indeed, several lines of evidence show that MCH activates stress responses and induces depressive- and anxiety-like behaviours, while the blockade of MCH(1) receptors results in antidepressant and anxiolytic effects in various rodent models. Moreover, MCH may decrease reward activity while increasing hypothalamus-pituitary adrenal axis activity, both of which may underlie the neurochemical mechanisms of the depression and anxiety-like effects induced by MCH. The effects of MCH(1) receptor antagonists in animal models, together with their rapid onset of effect and lack of adverse CNS effects, suggest that they deserve further investigation as potential new treatments for depression and anxiety disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Neuroscience 5 13%
Psychology 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from CNS Drugs
#512
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,820
of 187,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CNS Drugs
#164
of 541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.