| Title |
Die Kuibis-Fossilien der Nama-Formation von Südwestafrika
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PalZ, August 1933
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03041648 |
| Authors |
G. Gürich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 33% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,420,590
of 25,403,829 outputs
Outputs from PalZ
#83
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PalZ
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,403,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them