↓ Skip to main content

Efficiency of electronic signout for ED-to-inpatient admission at a non-teaching hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Efficiency of electronic signout for ED-to-inpatient admission at a non-teaching hospital
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11739-018-1816-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M. Singleton, Leon D. Sanchez, Barbara A. Masser, Betzalel Reich

Abstract

Admission handoff is a high-risk component of patient care. Previous studies have shown that a standardized physician electronic signout ("eSignout") may improve ED-to-inpatient handoff safety and efficiency in teaching hospitals. This model has not yet been studied in non-teaching hospitals. The objectives of the study were to determine the efficiency of an eSignout platform at a community affiliate hospital by comparing ED length of stay (LOS) for a 5-month period before and after implementation and to compare the quality assurance (QA) events among admitted patients for the same time period. A retrospective, interventional study was conducted with the main outcome measures including ED LOS with calculation of 95% CI, mean comparison (t test), and number of QA events before and after implementation of the eSignout model. Prior to eSignout implementation, 1045 patients were admitted [mean ED LOS 330.0 min (95% CI 318.6-341.4)]. Following implementation, 1106 patients were admitted [mean ED LOS 338.9 min (95% CI 327.4-350.4, p = 0.2853)]. Nine pre-implementation QA events and six post-implementation events were identified. Use of a physician eSignout in a non-teaching hospital had no statistically significant effect on ED LOS for the admitted patients. The effect of an electronic interdepartmental handoff tool for patient safety and clinical operations in the non-teaching setting is unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Lecturer 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,494,712
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#581
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,507
of 332,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.