↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of a cloned ANF-sensitive guanylate cyclase (GC-A) with particulate guanylate cyclase from adrenal cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of a cloned ANF-sensitive guanylate cyclase (GC-A) with particulate guanylate cyclase from adrenal cortex
Published in
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, January 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00175471
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jörg-Martin Heim, Sujay Singh, Hans-Jürgen Fülle, Rupert Gerzer

Abstract

Recently, an ANF-sensitive guanylate cyclase (GC-A) has been cloned from a rat brain cDNA library. Here we studied the stimulation of cyclic GMP accumulation in response to atrial natriuretic factor (ANF), urodilatin and atriopeptin I (AP-1) in a rat glioma C6 cell line permanently transfected with GC-A as well as GC-A activity in membranes from these C6 cells and in membranes from COS-7 cells that were transiently transfected with GC-A. We also measured binding affinities for these natriuretic peptides in the membrane preparations. These characteristics of GC-A were compared to those of membrane preparations from adrenal cortex of bovine and human origin. The order of potency of stimulation of cyclic GMP accumulation in permanently transfected glioma cells was ANF greater than urodilatin greater than AP I; AP I stimulated cyclic GMP accumulation. A similar order of potency was obtained for stimulation of guanylate cyclase activity in membranes from permanently transfected glioma cells as well as from transiently transfected COS-7 cells. In contrast, AP-1 was uneffective to stimulate guanylate cyclase in membrane preparations from adrenal cortex from bovine as well as from human origin. Furthermore, urodilatin was equipotent to ANF in these preparations. Binding affinities were comparable for ANF and urodilatin in membranes from cells transfected with GC-A and in membranes from adrenal cortex of both sources, whereas AP-1 had a weaker affinity in all preparations studied.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2010.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#347
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,494
of 61,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.