↓ Skip to main content

Chemical synthesis and biosynthesis of the cyclotide family of circular proteins

Overview of attention for article published in IUBMB Life, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemical synthesis and biosynthesis of the cyclotide family of circular proteins
Published in
IUBMB Life, January 2008
DOI 10.1080/15216540600889532
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunithi Gunasekera, Norelle L. Daly, Marilyn A. Anderson, David J. Craik

Abstract

Cyclotides are a recently discovered class of proteins that have a characteristic head-to-tail cyclized backbone stabilized by a knotted arrangement of three disulfide bonds. They are exceptionally resistant to chemical, enzymatic and thermal treatments because of their unique structural scaffold. Cyclotides have a range of bio-activities, including uterotonic, anti-HIV, anti-bacterial and cytotoxic activity but their insecticidal properties suggest that their natural physiological role is in plant defense. They are genetically encoded as linear precursors and subsequently processed to produce mature cyclic peptides but the mechanism by which this occurs remains unknown. Currently most cyclotides are obtained via direct extraction from plants in the Rubiaceae and Violaceae families. To facilitate the screening of cyclotides for structure-activity studies and to exploit them in drug design or agricultural applications a convenient route for the synthesis of cyclotides is vital. In this review the current chemical, recombinant and biosynthetic routes to the production of cyclotides are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 28%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 34%
Chemistry 23 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from IUBMB Life
#212
of 1,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,032
of 168,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IUBMB Life
#52
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.