You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Genome Sequence of Methanohalophilus mahii SLPT Reveals Differences in the Energy Metabolism among Members of the Methanosarcinaceae Inhabiting Freshwater and Saline Environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaea, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1155/2010/690737 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Spring, Carmen Scheuner, Alla Lapidus, Susan Lucas, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Alex Copeland, Jan-Fang Cheng, Feng Chen, Matt Nolan, Elizabeth Saunders, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Athanasios Lykidis, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D. Jeffries, Lynne Goodwin, John C. Detter, Thomas Brettin, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, Jim Bristow, Jonathan A. Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk |
| Abstract |
Methanohalophilus mahii is the type species of the genus Methanohalophilus, which currently comprises three distinct species with validly published names. Mhp. mahii represents moderately halophilic methanogenic archaea with a strictly methylotrophic metabolism. The type strain SLP(T) was isolated from hypersaline sediments collected from the southern arm of Great Salt Lake, Utah. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 2,012,424 bp genome is a single replicon with 2032 protein-coding and 63 RNA genes and part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project. A comparison of the reconstructed energy metabolism in the halophilic species Mhp. mahii with other representatives of the Methanosarcinaceae reveals some interesting differences to freshwater species. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archaea
#56
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,181
of 192,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaea
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.