↓ Skip to main content

Diverted development of reproductive organs: A source of morphological innovation in land plants

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Diverted development of reproductive organs: A source of morphological innovation in land plants
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, March 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf00987946
Authors

Peter R. Crane, Paul Kenrick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 12 25%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 60%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#152
of 956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,458
of 29,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 956 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.