↓ Skip to main content

Chlorophyll breakdown in higher plants and algae

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, September 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Chlorophyll breakdown in higher plants and algae
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, September 1999
DOI 10.1007/s000180050434
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Hörtensteiner

Abstract

Leaf senescence is accompanied by the metabolism of chlorophyll (Chl) to nonfluorescent catabolites (NCCs). The pathway of Chl degradation comprises several reactions and includes the occurrence of intermediary catabolites. After removal of phytol and the central Mg atom from Chl by chlorophyllase and Mg dechelatase, respectively, the porphyrin macrocycle of pheophorbide (Pheide) a is cleaved. This two-step reaction is catalyzed by Pheide a oxygenase and RCC reductase and yields a primary fluorescent catabolite (pFCC). After hydroxylation and additional species-specific modifications, FCCs are tautomerized nonenzymically to NCCs inside the vacuole. Different subcellular compartments participate in Chl catabolism and, thus, transport processes across membranes are required. This review focuses on the catabolites and the individual reactions of Chl breakdown in higher plants. In addition, the pathway is compared to Chl conversion to red catabolites in an alga, Chlorella protothecoides. Finally, the significance and regulation of Chl degradation are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 111 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Master 14 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 14%
Environmental Science 10 8%
Chemistry 5 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2,146
of 5,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,515
of 35,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.