| Title |
Negative staining and image classification — powerful tools in modern electron microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Procedures Online, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1251/bpo70 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie Ohi, Ying Li, Yifan Cheng, Thomas Walz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 779 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 743 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 218 | 28% |
| Researcher | 135 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 86 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 81 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 39 | 5% |
| Other | 95 | 12% |
| Unknown | 125 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 243 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 230 | 30% |
| Chemistry | 57 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 2% |
| Engineering | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 82 | 11% |
| Unknown | 135 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,131,735
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#8
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,956
of 65,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them