↓ Skip to main content

Perspectives on Healthcare Provider Well-Being: Looking Back, Moving Forward

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 443)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Perspectives on Healthcare Provider Well-Being: Looking Back, Moving Forward
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10880-018-9541-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Penwell-Waines, Wendy Ward, Heather Kirkpatrick, Patrick Smith, Marwan Abouljoud

Abstract

Recognizing the impact of healthcare professional (HCP) burnout has led to vigorous interest from organizations and individuals regarding how to most effectively promote HCP well-being. The present paper reviews the literature on HCP well-being and describes factors that impact well-being at various levels (i.e., system, institution, program, interpersonal, and individual). We propose that change must occur at all levels to have the greatest impact. Further, we highlight opportunities to advance research on HCP well-being (e.g., being more inclusive regarding study populations and designing longitudinal intervention studies).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 30 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 8 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 37 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,896,195
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#25
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,144
of 333,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.