You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Knowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional study among mental health professionals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dominik Schori, Matthias Jaeger, Timon Elmer, Susanne Jaeger, Candelaria Mahlke, Kolja Heumann, Anastasia Theodoridou, Gianfranco Zuaboni, Bernd Kozel, Franziska Rabenschlag |
| Abstract |
Treatment pressure restricts patients' voluntary and autonomous decisions. Yet interventions involving treatment pressure are widely used in mental health and psychosocial services. This cross-sectional study explored whether mental health professionals' knowledge on five types of treatment pressure (no coercion, persuasion or conviction, leverage, threat, and formal coercion) was associated with sociodemographic, professional and contextual factors. A more positive attitude towards interventions involving treatment pressure was associated with underrating the level of those interventions compared with a predefined default value. The treatment setting and professional group played a minor role in 'leverage' and 'formal coercion' types of treatment pressure, respectively. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
#500
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,669
of 351,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.