↓ Skip to main content

Growth of a black hole on a self-gravitating radiation

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal C, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
Title
Growth of a black hole on a self-gravitating radiation
Published in
The European Physical Journal C, December 2018
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6487-4
Authors

Hyeong-Chan Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal C
#3,860
of 9,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,675
of 444,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal C
#87
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,054 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.