↓ Skip to main content

A Continent of Plant Defense Peptide Diversity: Cyclotides in Australian Hybanthus (Violaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Continent of Plant Defense Peptide Diversity: Cyclotides in Australian Hybanthus (Violaceae)
Published in
Plant Cell, September 2005
DOI 10.1105/tpc.105.034678
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shane M. Simonsen, Lillian Sando, David C. Ireland, Michelle L. Colgrave, Rekha Bharathi, Ulf Göransson, David J. Craik

Abstract

Cyclotides are plant-derived miniproteins that have the unusual features of a head-to-tail cyclized peptide backbone and a knotted arrangement of disulfide bonds. It had been postulated that they might be an especially large family of host defense agents, but this had not yet been tested by field data on cyclotide variation in wild plant populations. In this study, we sampled Australian Hybanthus (Violaceae) to gain an insight into the level of variation within populations, within species, and between species. A wealth of cyclotide diversity was discovered: at least 246 new cyclotides are present in the 11 species sampled, and 26 novel sequences were characterized. A new approach to the discovery of cyclotide sequences was developed based on the identification of a conserved sequence within a signal sequence in cyclotide precursors. The number of cyclotides in the Violaceae is now estimated to be >9000. Cyclotide physicochemical profiles were shown to be a useful taxonomic feature that reflected species and their morphological relationships. The novel sequences provided substantial insight into the tolerance of the cystine knot framework in cyclotides to amino acid substitutions and will facilitate protein engineering applications of this framework.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 19%
Chemistry 10 13%
Unspecified 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell
#2,599
of 7,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,140
of 69,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell
#8
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.