↓ Skip to main content

Human and Mouse Enamel Phenotypes Resulting from Mutation or Altered Expression of AMEL, ENAM, MMP20 and KLK4

Overview of attention for article published in Cells Tissues Organs, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human and Mouse Enamel Phenotypes Resulting from Mutation or Altered Expression of AMEL, ENAM, MMP20 and KLK4
Published in
Cells Tissues Organs, August 2008
DOI 10.1159/000151378
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Timothy Wright, Thomas C. Hart, P. Suzanne Hart, Darrin Simmons, Cynthia Suggs, Bill Daley, Jim Simmer, Jan Hu, John D. Bartlett, Yong Li, Zhi-An Yuan, W. Kim Seow, Carolyn W. Gibson

Abstract

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is caused by AMEL, ENAM, MMP20 and KLK4 gene mutations. Mice lacking expression of the AmelX, Enam and Mmp20 genes have been generated. These mouse models provide tools for understanding enamel formation and AI pathogenesis. This study describes the AI phenotypes and relates them to their mouse model counterparts. Human AI phenotypes were determined in a clinical population of AI families and published cases. Human and murine teeth were evaluated using light and electron microscopy. A total of 463 individuals from 54 families were evaluated and mutations in the AMEL, ENAM and KLK4 genes were identified. The majority of human mutations for genes coding enamel nonproteinase proteins (AMEL and ENAM) resulted in variable hypoplasia ranging from local pitting to a marked, generalized enamel thinning. Specific AMEL mutations were associated with abnormal mineralization and maturation defects. Amel and Enam null murine models displayed marked enamel hypoplasia and a complete loss of prism structure. Human mutations in genes coding for the enamel proteinases (MMP20 and KLK4) cause variable degrees of hypomineralization. The murine Mmp20 null mouse exhibits both hypoplastic and hypomineralized defects. The currently available Amel and Enam mouse models for AI exhibit enamel phenotypes (hypoplastic) that are generally similar to those seen in humans. Mmp20 null mice have a greater degree of hypoplasia than humans with MMP20 mutations. Mice lacking expression of the currently known genes associated with the human AI conditions provide useful models for understanding the pathogenesis of these conditions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
France 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cells Tissues Organs
#173
of 713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,161
of 98,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cells Tissues Organs
#25
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 713 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.