↓ Skip to main content

An integrated evaluation of thirteen modelling solutions for the generation of hourly values of air relative humidity

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Climatology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
An integrated evaluation of thirteen modelling solutions for the generation of hourly values of air relative humidity
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00704-010-0274-y
Authors

Simone Bregaglio, Marcello Donatelli, Roberto Confalonieri, Marco Acutis, Simone Orlandini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 48%
Environmental Science 6 14%
Computer Science 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#954
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,652
of 96,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.