↓ Skip to main content

Hamsi scoring in the prediction of unfavorable outcomes from tuberculous meningitis: results of Haydarpasa-II study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Hamsi scoring in the prediction of unfavorable outcomes from tuberculous meningitis: results of Haydarpasa-II study
Published in
Journal of Neurology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00415-015-7651-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hakan Erdem, Derya Ozturk-Engin, Hulya Tireli, Gamze Kilicoglu, Sylviane Defres, Serda Gulsun, Gonul Sengoz, Alexandru Crisan, Isik Somuncu Johansen, Asuman Inan, Mihai Nechifor, Akram Al-Mahdawi, Rok Civljak, Muge Ozguler, Branislava Savic, Nurgul Ceran, Bruno Cacopardo, Ayse Seza Inal, Mustafa Namiduru, Saim Dayan, Uner Kayabas, Emine Parlak, Ahmad Khalifa, Ebru Kursun, Oguz Resat Sipahi, Mucahit Yemisen, Ayhan Akbulut, Mehmet Bitirgen, Natasa Popovic, Bahar Kandemir, Catalina Luca, Mehmet Parlak, Jean Paul Stahl, Filiz Pehlivanoglu, Soline Simeon, Aysegul Ulu-Kilic, Kadriye Yasar, Gulden Yilmaz, Emel Yilmaz, Bojana Beovic, Melanie Catroux, Botond Lakatos, Mustafa Sunbul, Oral Oncul, Selma Alabay, Elif Sahin-Horasan, Sukran Kose, Ghaydaa Shehata, Katell Andre, Gorana Dragovac, Hanefi Cem Gul, Ahmet Karakas, Stéphane Chadapaud, Yves Hansmann, Arjan Harxhi, Valerija Kirova, Isabelle Masse-Chabredier, Serkan Oncu, Alper Sener, Recep Tekin, Nazif Elaldi, Ozcan Deveci, Hacer Deniz Ozkaya, Oguz Karabay, Seniha Senbayrak, Canan Agalar, Haluk Vahaboglu

Abstract

Predicting unfavorable outcome is of paramount importance in clinical decision making. Accordingly, we designed this multinational study, which provided the largest case series of tuberculous meningitis (TBM). 43 centers from 14 countries (Albania, Croatia, Denmark, Egypt, France, Hungary, Iraq, Italy, Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, Syria, Turkey) submitted data of microbiologically confirmed TBM patients hospitalized between 2000 and 2012. Unfavorable outcome was defined as survival with significant sequela or death. In developing our index, binary logistic regression models were constructed via 200 replicates of database by bootstrap resampling methodology. The final model was built according to the selection frequencies of variables. The severity scale included variables with arbitrary scores proportional to predictive powers of terms in the final model. The final model was internally validated by bootstrap resampling. A total of 507 patients' data were submitted among which 165 had unfavorable outcome. Eighty-six patients died while 119 had different neurological sequelae in 79 (16 %) patients. The full model included 13 variables. Age, nausea, vomiting, altered consciousness, hydrocephalus, vasculitis, immunosuppression, diabetes mellitus and neurological deficit remained in the final model. Scores 1-3 were assigned to the variables in the severity scale, which included scores of 1-6. The distribution of mortality for the scores 1-6 was 3.4, 8.2, 20.6, 31, 30 and 40.1 %, respectively. Altered consciousness, diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, neurological deficits, hydrocephalus, and vasculitis predicted the unfavorable outcome in the scoring and the cumulative score provided a linear estimation of prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 20 28%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,811,512
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,723
of 4,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,962
of 355,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#41
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.