↓ Skip to main content

On the Unethical Use of Privileged Information in Strategic Decision-Making: The Effects of Peers’ Ethicality, Perceived Cohesion, and Team Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
On the Unethical Use of Privileged Information in Strategic Decision-Making: The Effects of Peers’ Ethicality, Perceived Cohesion, and Team Performance
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-3822-5
Authors

Kevin J. Johnson, Joé T. Martineau, Saouré Kouamé, Gokhan Turgut, Serge Poisson-de-Haro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 31 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 27 33%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Psychology 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 33 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2018.
All research outputs
#19,630,735
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,655
of 3,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,519
of 338,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#50
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.