↓ Skip to main content

Notes on the Biology and Uses of the Motacú Palm(Attalea phalerata, Arecaceae) from Bolivia

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, October 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Notes on the Biology and Uses of the Motacú Palm(Attalea phalerata, Arecaceae) from Bolivia
Published in
Economic Botany, October 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02866525
Authors

Moraes R. Mónica, Finn Borchsenius, Ulla Blicher-Mathiesen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 6%
Peru 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 21%
Professor 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 55%
Environmental Science 4 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2011.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#273
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,533
of 28,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them