↓ Skip to main content

Progress of Regenerative Therapy in Orthopedics

Overview of attention for article published in Current Osteoporosis Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Progress of Regenerative Therapy in Orthopedics
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11914-018-0428-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pearlin, Sunita Nayak, Geetha Manivasagam, Dwaipayan Sen

Abstract

To conduct a thorough appraisal of recent and inventive advances in the field of bone tissue engineering using biomaterials, cell-based research, along with the incorporation of biomimetic properties using surface modification of scaffolds. This paper will provide an overview on different biomaterials and emerging techniques involved in the fabrication of scaffolds, brief description of signaling pathways involved in osteogenesis, and the effect of surface modification on the fate of progenitor cells. The current strategies used for regenerative medicine like cell therapy, gene transfer, and tissue engineering have opened numerous therapeutic avenues for the treatment of various disabling orthopedic disorders. Precise strategy utilized for the reconstruction, restoration, or repair of the bone-related tissues exploits cells, biomaterials, morphogenetic signals, and appropriate mechanical environment to provide the basic constituents required for creating new tissue. Combining all the above strategies in clinical trials would pave the way for successful "bench to bedside" transformation in bone healing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 25 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Chemical Engineering 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 26 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,933,348
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#362
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,067
of 330,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Osteoporosis Reports
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.