↓ Skip to main content

Lower limb lymphoscintigraphy patterns among patients with lower limb lymphedema: a pictorial essay

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Imaging, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Lower limb lymphoscintigraphy patterns among patients with lower limb lymphedema: a pictorial essay
Published in
Clinical and Translational Imaging, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40336-018-0266-y
Authors

Edward C. Nganga, Samuel Gitau, Khalid Makhdomi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Materials Science 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,494,712
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Imaging
#163
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,391
of 332,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Imaging
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.